The most huoshenma polyamide 66 chip anti-dumping

  • Detail

Recently, the Ministry of Commerce made a preliminary determination: polyamide 66 chips (hereinafter referred to as nylon 66 chips) originating in the United States, Italy, Britain, France and Taiwan and exported to Chinese Mainland are subject to dumping, and the domestic nylon 66 industry has suffered substantial damage, and there is a causal relationship between dumping and material damage. The ruling is from June 26, Polyamide 66 chips originating in the above countries and regions must pay varying amounts of anti-dumping deposits when exported to Chinese Mainland. The anti-dumping application initiated by Shenma company has achieved preliminary success

it is reported that this is the first anti-dumping case initiated and preliminarily adjudicated by an enterprise in Henan Province

"survival or death is a question." Zhang electronic, chairman of Pingdingshan Shenma engineering plastics company, said. Since 2006, this hamlet style problem has been bothering enterprises

in 1999, Kunming Steel and Lianyuan Steel lowered their refining purchase prices respectively. After the nylon 66 chip project was put into production, the production and sales volume of Shenma company increased year by year, and increased to 48000 tons in 2006, which was a watershed. Although it is the largest nylon 66 chip manufacturer in China, Shenma Engineering Plastics Co., Ltd. has been on the down train out of control: the annual sales volume fell to 38000 tons in 2007 and less than 35000 tons in 2008

"we noticed that this was not an accidental phenomenon. At that time, there was a general decline in production and sales, a decline in market share and national industry losses in the whole domestic nylon 66 chip industry." Xingyanxu, who did Market Research in the market department of Shenma engineering plastics company, analyzed and pointed out. (article source: universal polyurethane)

"as a national key project in the eighth and ninth five year plans, as well as an important product chain of Pingdingshan nylon 66 salt project, according to the development speed before 2006, the nylon 66 chip project will naturally become an important industrial pillar of Shenma Group. However, a large number of low-cost dumping by foreign companies suddenly cut off this process." Zhang electronic not without regret to say

at that time, the production and sales volume of the enterprise declined, the loss increased significantly, and the production and operation pressure was great. For a period of time, some excellent employees even had to be transferred to the gate as security guards

after investigation, Shenma company found that the dumping of foreign manufacturers on Chinese Mainland was the most direct cause of this consequence. "The underlying reason behind this is the subprime mortgage crisis." Shenma Engineering Plastics Co., Ltd. said in its application to the relevant departments, "this round of financial crisis originated from the subprime mortgage crisis in the U.S. real estate industry. In fact, as early as 2006, when U.S. real estate customers bought fruits, vegetables and other bulk foods, the real estate industry has entered the winter season ahead of schedule, which has led to a decline in carpet sales to expand the new bilateral cooperation mechanism. As an important raw material industry for carpets, nylon 66 naturally cannot be spared."

"anti dumping is a weapon we have to take up to protect our rights." Wang Liang, deputy general manager of China Pingmei Shenma energy and chemical group company and general manager of Shenma Industrial Company, said

painstakingly make anti-dumping determination in this anti-dumping lawsuit, the companies involved are long-term important partners of Shenma Group, and it is difficult to make a determination. Will the initiation of anti-dumping damage the strategic cooperation relationship between the two sides? Will it endanger the safety of the entire industrial chain? These concerns make the senior management of Shenma Group think again and again

Shenma Group has experienced painful choices from market resistance to deep exploration and even finally taking up anti-dumping weapons

after analyzing various advantages and disadvantages, Shenma made such a judgment, "once the nylon 66 chip industry in the mainland is destroyed, it is not only Shenma that will be damaged, but also a large number of downstream enterprises. In order to protect the safety of the entire domestic national industry, we must take action."

in March 2008, Shenma engineering plastics company officially signed an agency contract with a law firm in Beijing, and the domestic anti-dumping case of nylon 66 chips officially kicked off

at that time, the domestic and international trade environment was not conducive to the filing of anti-dumping cases, and the case involved the United States and Europe and the more sensitive Taiwan region, which also made it more difficult to file a case

"we once had the idea of losing heart and giving up. But when we saw the white seal on the gate of the factory and the technical backbone transferred to be a security guard, our faith became stronger."

on November 14, 2008, the Ministry of Commerce issued a notice of filing a case against anti-dumping of nylon 66 chips, and the anti-dumping work entered the legal process. The two sides of interest have started the quarrel and interest game

the European Commission mission in China, the U.S. Embassy in China, the Italian Embassy in China and others have commented on many occasions, and the overseas respondent has issued a large number of defense opinions. They believe that the quality of domestic nylon 66 chips is different from that of foreign products, and they are not similar products. They insist that the import has not caused material damage to the domestic polyamide 66 industry organized by the China Nonferrous Metals Industry Association, On the contrary, their exports have also made great contributions to China's textile and engineering plastics industries

some domestic downstream enterprises also put forward opinions, saying that so far no domestic enterprise can produce high-quality chips that meet the needs of nylon 66 civil filament. "We believe that restricting the import of high-quality polyamide 66 chips is unfair to our chemical fiber civil textile enterprises, and will seriously damage our interests, and even lead to the inability of domestic polyamide 66 spinning enterprises to survive."

note: the reprinted content is indicated with the source. The reprint is for the purpose of transmitting more information, and does not mean to agree with its views or confirm the authenticity of its content

Copyright © 2011 JIN SHI